🔐 Abrir TEXTO DE APOIO (material-base da questão)
Intelligence augmentation shows that human + AI is an ideal partnership – and the future of white-collar work
The less exciting but more likely reality is that the changes AI brings to the workplace will entail upskilling — when workers learn new skills — not reskilling or complete replacement. And upskilling is not about surrendering to AI but instead about mastering intelligence augmentation, or IA, which is what happens when humans and AI work together to accomplish more as a team than either could flying solo. That collaboration is based on the distinction between two concepts: reckoning and judgment.
Reckoning vs. Judgment
A critical difference between AI and humans is our primary mode of operation. AI operates through what is often referred to as “reckoning,” such as calculative prediction. By that, we mean AI’s true capabilities are grounded in facts and historical knowledge - data that can be calculated, memorized, and repeated. It makes predictions based on what it knows.
By contrast, humans operate through judgment or practical wisdom. We understand things AI can’t possibly know. That’s because we humans have lived experiences that continually inform how we see the world. It’s the intangible factors, like ethical considerations and empathetic responses, that make humans better equipped than AI to make complex decisions about human affairs.
This practical wisdom is one reason humans must keep creating new things for IA to advance. Imagine what would happen if humans stopped writing original content. The current model of AI could never pass a certain point because it would never encounter new, innovative ideas. Eventually, AI would run out of new ideas to share, and our collective knowledge would stagnate. AI is like moonlight; its ideas come from the reflected sunlight of human insights.
Now, it’s essential to recognize that this contrast between AI and humans is nothing to fear. Instead, it shows us why “human + AI” is an ideal work partnership. AI can perform massive calculations in the blink of an eye at a pace far superior to even the most intelligent human on the planet. When paired with a human capable of making quick decisions based on lived experience, judgment, and practical wisdom, it’s an immensely more powerful tool than it is on its own.
QUESTÃO
Mark the option that is closest in meaning to the passage below:
“Eventually, AI would run out of new ideas to share” (. 32).
Al could suffer a setback overnight.
sSuddenly, AI systems would be powerless.
As time goes by, it’d exhaust its inventiveness.
Sooner or later, expert systems tools tend to fail.
🔐 Abrir GABARITO
🔐 Abrir QUESTÃO COMENTADA (leitura guiada + pegadinhas)
🧭 Leitura orientada
A questão avalia paráfrase semântica, exigindo a identificação da alternativa que mantém o sentido original do trecho apresentado.
🔍 Análise do trecho
A frase:
“Eventually, AI would run out of new ideas to share.”
Expressa a noção de que, com o passar do tempo, a IA deixaria de gerar novidades, pois depende da criatividade humana prévia.
🧠 Núcleo de sentido
✔ Eventually = com o tempo / mais cedo ou mais tarde.
✔ Run out of = esgotar / ficar sem.
✔ Ideia central: esgotamento progressivo, não colapso súbito.
🔍 Análise alternativa por alternativa (com pegadinhas)
(A) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: setback overnight indica algo súbito,
inexistente no trecho.
(B) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: suddenly contradiz a ideia de processo gradual.
(C) ✅ Correta — GABARITO
A alternativa preserva tanto o valor temporal
(as time goes by)
quanto o sentido de esgotamento
(exhaust its inventiveness).
(D) ❌ Errada
Pegadinha: fala em falha de sistemas,
não em limitação criativa.
🧠 Resumo B3GE™ Master
✔ Questão de paráfrase.
✔ Atenção a advérbios temporais e verbos frasais.
✔ Run out of = esgotar.
✔ Alternativa correta mantém ideia de processo gradual.
🔎 Gabarito confirmado: (C)