🟨 TEXT 2.
The Impact of Electric Vehicles on the Automotive Industry
Looking at the environmental, economical, and political impact of electric vehicles.
By Patrick Peterson of GoodCar
Electric vehicles (EVs) have had a remarkable glow-up in a relatively short period.
It wasn't so long ago that public opinion labeled them as overpriced, inefficient options with poor mileage to boot.
However, rising climate concerns and the volatility of gas prices have pushed more people to refresh their understanding of the technology.
While misinformation is rampant, people's faith in EVs has risen enough that over 40 percent of Americans would seriously consider making the switch.
Growing interest pressures manufacturers to reorganize their supply chains with a stronger emphasis on EVs.
This sounds simple, but there are significant differences in EV development compared to gas-powered cars.
The longstanding dominance of gas-powered vehicles makes most people believe it was the only option up until now. But that's wrong.
The idea of electric vehicles has been experimented with since the early 1800s.
Robert Anderson is credited for inventing the first electric vehicle.
The Scottish inventor used primary cells (single-use batteries) to power a motor he fixed to a carriage. This idea for a “horseless carriage” was a pivotal moment in history that gave future inventors a foundation to work on. Jump to today, and EVs have skyrocketed in popularity.
They've proven to be a more sustainable option and have a lower overall cost than gas-powered cars. Opponents of adopting EVs argue that battery-powered vehicles aren't entirely emission-free. And they're right.
Carbon emissions are created during the manufacturing process and when charging the battery.
This is because fossil fuels are required to mine the minerals used in batteries and to generate the power used to recharge them.
However, these emissions are substantially lower than those released by cars using an internal combustion engine.
A study performed by MIT found that electric-powered cars created about 25 percent fewer carbon emissions per mile than a gasoline alternative. This study even assumed the cars were in less eco-friendly states.
When Washington was used as the backdrop, the study reported that an EV would create 61 percent fewer emissions.
This is due to Washington drawing a lot of its energy from hydropower.
Norway, Europe's biggest EV market, takes a similar approach.
Over half of Americans are willing to pay more for sustainably responsible products.
A comparable number of citizens say the same thing about gasoline.
This support for greener brands shows the automotive industry how the future will look.
Manufacturers' supply and production procedures must start adapting now to prepare for the future. There are even various government incentives to make the process easier.
🔗 Adapted from: Unsustainable Magazine — https://www.unsustainablemagazine.com/impact-of-electric-vehicles/
🟨 QUESTÃO 34.
According to the text, mark the option that most accurately reflects the relationship between public perception and electric vehicle adoption:
🄰 Public perception has remained unchanged despite technological advancements in EVs.
🄱 Rising gas prices have had no impact on the perception of electric vehicles.
🄲 An improved perception of EVs has directly influenced consumer interest and market demand.
🄳 Americans still reject the idea of electric vehicles.
🄴 The public's support for EVs stems mainly from government mandates.
Gabarito: 🄲
🧭 1️⃣ Leitura orientada
A questão exige identificar a relação de causa e efeito entre mudança de percepção pública e aumento do interesse pelos EVs. O texto é explícito ao conectar percepção positiva, intenção de compra e pressão sobre fabricantes.
📝 2️⃣ Análise técnica das alternativas
(A) ❌ Incorreta.
O texto mostra mudança clara de percepção ao longo do tempo.
🚩 Pegadinha: negar informação explícita.
(B) ❌ Incorreta.
O texto afirma que a volatilidade dos preços do combustível
influenciou diretamente a percepção pública.
🚩 Pegadinha: ignorar fator causal mencionado.
(C) ✅ Correta.
A melhora da percepção levou a maior interesse,
intenção de compra e reorganização do mercado.
🚩 Pegadinha evitada: leitura integrada do texto.
(D) ❌ Incorreta.
Mais de 40% dos americanos considerariam a troca,
logo não há rejeição generalizada.
🚩 Pegadinha: absolutização falsa.
(E) ❌ Incorreta.
Embora incentivos existam, o texto enfatiza
mudança de percepção e escolha do consumidor,
não imposição estatal.
🚩 Pegadinha: confundir incentivo com mandato.
⚠️ 3️⃣ Armadilhas clássicas do IME
• Ignorar conectores de causa (“however”, “while”)
• Desconsiderar dados percentuais explícitos
• Confundir políticas públicas com opinião popular
🧠 4️⃣ Resumo B3GE™ Master
✔ Percepção pública mudou positivamente
✔ Isso elevou interesse do consumidor
✔ Mercado e fabricantes reagiram
🔎 Gabarito confirmado: (C)