🟨 TEXT 2.
The Impact of Electric Vehicles on the Automotive Industry
Looking at the environmental, economical, and political impact of electric vehicles.
By Patrick Peterson of GoodCar
Electric vehicles (EVs) have had a remarkable glow-up in a relatively short period.
It wasn't so long ago that public opinion labeled them as overpriced, inefficient options with poor mileage to boot.
However, rising climate concerns and the volatility of gas prices have pushed more people to refresh their understanding of the technology.
While misinformation is rampant, people's faith in EVs has risen enough that over 40 percent of Americans would seriously consider making the switch.
Growing interest pressures manufacturers to reorganize their supply chains with a stronger emphasis on EVs.
This sounds simple, but there are significant differences in EV development compared to gas-powered cars.
The longstanding dominance of gas-powered vehicles makes most people believe it was the only option up until now. But that's wrong.
The idea of electric vehicles has been experimented with since the early 1800s.
Robert Anderson is credited for inventing the first electric vehicle.
The Scottish inventor used primary cells (single-use batteries) to power a motor he fixed to a carriage. This idea for a "horseless carriage" was a pivotal moment in history that gave future inventors a foundation to work on. Jump to today, and EVs have skyrocketed in popularity.
They've proven to be a more sustainable option and have a lower overall cost than gas-powered cars. Opponents of adopting EVs argue that battery-powered vehicles aren't entirely emission-free. And they're right.
Carbon emissions are created during the manufacturing process and when charging the battery.
This is because fossil fuels are required to mine the minerals used in batteries and to generate the power used to recharge them.
However, these emissions are substantially lower than those released by cars using an internal combustion engine.
A study performed by MIT found that electric-powered cars created about 25 percent fewer carbon emissions per mile than a gasoline alternative. This study even assumed the cars were in less eco-friendly states.
When Washington was used as the backdrop, the study reported that an EV would create 61 percent fewer emissions.
This is due to Washington drawing a lot of its energy from hydropower.
Norway, Europe's biggest EV market, takes a similar approach.
Over half of Americans are willing to pay more for sustainably responsible products.
A comparable number of citizens say the same thing about gasoline.
This support for greener brands shows the automotive industry how the future will look.
Manufacturers' supply and production procedures must start adapting now to prepare for the future. There are even various government incentives to make the process easier.
🔗 Adapted from: Unsustainable Magazine — https://www.unsustainablemagazine.com/impact-of-electric-vehicles/
🟨 QUESTÃO 31.
Mark the option that best captures the author's tone throughout the article:
🄰 Sarcastic and dismissive.
🄱 Informative and optimistic.
🄲 Apologetic and uncertain.
🄳 Critical and disapproving.
🄴 Detached and indifferent.
Gabarito: 🄱
🧭 1️⃣ Leitura orientada
A questão avalia tom textual (author’s tone). É preciso observar o conjunto do discurso, não frases isoladas. O texto explica, contextualiza dados e projeta o futuro de forma positiva.
📝 2️⃣ Análise técnica das alternativas
(A) ❌ Sarcastic and dismissive.
Não há ironia nem desdém. O texto é sério e explicativo.
🚩 Pegadinha: confundir crítica pontual com sarcasmo.
(B) ✅ Informative and optimistic.
O autor informa com dados, estudos e exemplos,
e projeta um futuro positivo para os EVs.
🚩 Pegadinha evitada: leitura global do texto.
(C) ❌ Apologetic and uncertain.
O autor não pede desculpas nem demonstra insegurança;
ele sustenta suas afirmações com evidências.
🚩 Pegadinha: associar cautela científica a incerteza emocional.
(D) ❌ Critical and disapproving.
Apesar de reconhecer limitações dos EVs,
o tom geral é favorável, não reprovador.
🚩 Pegadinha: supervalorizar menções a críticas.
(E) ❌ Detached and indifferent.
O autor demonstra envolvimento claro com o tema
e preocupação com o futuro da indústria.
🚩 Pegadinha: confundir objetividade com indiferença.
⚠️ 3️⃣ Armadilhas clássicas do IME
• Analisar apenas um parágrafo isolado
• Confundir tom crítico pontual com postura geral
• Ignorar expressões positivas e projeções futuras
🧠 4️⃣ Resumo B3GE™ Master
✔ Texto explicativo + dados objetivos
✔ Reconhece limites, mas enfatiza avanços
✔ Projeta futuro positivo para EVs
🔎 Gabarito confirmado: (B)